March Madness – Eggsellent reading for Easter…

Due to circumstances beyond my control, I’m late posting this round up of March’s reading materials. Apologies to anyone who was holding their breath waiting for it…

Product Details

Zombies V Unicorns  Edited by Holly Black and Justine Larbalestier

I do enjoy a good collection of short stories, and these were even better than I had expected – I honestly thought I’d be skipping the Unicorn stories, being a member of Team Zombie, but I’m really glad I didn’t. Don’t bring your prejudices along for this book, there are stories on both sides that will exceed or confound your expectations,

Leviathan - Scott Westerfeld

I’ve seen the trilogy of Steampunk/Althistory books by Scott Westerfeld many times, but only managed to get hold of the first this month. It’s a roaringly good read, and a good take on the steampunk genre, with some genuinely new ideas, a good solid real-world feel and the labyrinthine politics of the eve of the First World War.

Product Details

Chrono Virus - Aaron Crocco

Aaron Crocco is a writer I have met through G+, where he spends far more time promoting other author’s works than he does his own. This gem of a sci-fi tale was on offer during the week of his birthday, but it’s worth the price ANY day of the week. I’m hoping there are more stories for him to tell in the universe he’s got here.

Doctor Who: The Silurian Gift – Mike Tucker

As you may already know, Eldest Weasel is a Doctor Who fanatic, and since she shares my Kindle account (as does the entire family) we have slightly more Doctor Who books than the average for a Canadian family. I read this one when I was stuck for entertainment (which is why I have a kindle, after all…) I wasn’t disappointed, and it’s increased the chances of her getting more books in this series.

Artemis Fowl and the Atlantis Complex – Eoin Colfer

Whether it’s true or not, I remember reading about the first Artemis Fowl adventure in the same newspaper article that mentioned the release of a book about a young boy called Harry Potter. Artemis hasn’t taken the world by storm in the same way, and I really feel the series lost its way after the fourth book, but this one was something of a return to form. It was promising enough to make me consider finding “The Last Guardian”, supposedly the final book. It wasn’t enough for me to forgive Eoin Colfer for writing a Hitchhiker’s Guide book.

Han Solo and the Lost Legacy – Brian Daley

I first read this trilogy of stories when I was very much younger, and there wasn’t the proliferation of Star Wars material there is now. For many years the only books outside the original trilogy were “Splinter of the Mind’s Eye” by Alan Dean Foster, and these three books about Han Solo’s early days. I read the UK versions, which are nearly identical, except for the droid “Zollux”. In one novel Han says to the droid “Even your name is a joke!” and I wondered about that line for years. “Zollux” didn’t seem funny, even in a science fiction context. It wasn’t until I got hold of a US Star Wars dictionary and found an entry for “Bollux” the droid that I understood. Tender-hearted UK publishers had baulked at the profanity and exchanged the B for a Z…

The stories are still enjoyable, by the way.

The Iron Wyrm Affair – Lillith Saintcrow

It’s been a good month for Steampunk. This story has more than a little magical element, but retains the Victoriana and Anglocentrism that seems to be de rigeur. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would, and may well go looking for the sequel, if only to find out more of the central character’s back story.

Doctor Who – The Nameless City

Product DetailsProduct Details

and The Spear of Destiny

Given my review of “The Silurian Gift” earlier, you can guess how these two turned up. I was never a fan of the first three doctors, only beginning to watch with the fourth (The “Proper” Doctor, obviously) but recent access through Netflix has allowed me to revisit old episodes and I thought these two stories did justice to the earlier incarnations of the Doctor, as well as showcasing some old favourite companions too.

Product Details

Death of Kings – Bernard Cornwell

I usually hate picking up a book in the middle of an established series, but I’ve read plenty of Bernard Cornwell’s books (I even met him once) and there’s a kind of rhythm to them. I wondered, as I read this one (Book six of a series) whether I’d read any of the earlier ones. It recounts the perilous state of England as King Alfred the Great lies dying. I used to live in Winchester, where Alfred had his capital and his statue still stands. Having lived in Canada for four years, it was nice to wallow in English history for a while and remember that I had seen many of the places that the book’s hero visits. And sets fire to.

Product Details

Death’s Excellent Vacation – Charlaine Harris and others

Short stories again, see? This collection felt a little more hit and miss that the Zombies Vs Unicorns, something I found with the other collection from Charlaine Harris and Co (An Apple for the Creature, reviewed in January). But if you’re a Sookie Stackhouse fan, you’ll read it for this story at least. I like the Haunted Pirate Dave story, personally.

So there you have it. March was a busy month, but I crammed in a lot of books, mostly because of the short stories and the kindle effect – I take the kindle with me to places I wouldn’t take a book, because the kindle has several functions. Thus I have the books on hand…

Please feel free to argue with me about my reviews, or to recommend other books for me to try next month.

Videogame violence – An unscientific analysis.

Not so long ago there was a horrific massacre by one individual armed with several guns. This spawned the usual round of condemnation and a search for cause. Inevitably, amidst the furore over the right or wrong of gun ownership, someone took a potshot or two at violent videogames.

The argument goes something like this: Loner types sit in dark rooms playing games where they are heavily armed and can gun down imaginary people with impunity. After a certain amount of time doing this, something snaps inside their head and they go out and gun down real people. Therefore, to prevent future massacres, the logical thing to do is ban videogames.

This image was selected at random and no motivation, intention or cause is intended to be associated with this game.

This image was selected at random and no motivation, intention or cause is intended to be associated with this game.

Here’s my disclaimer. I’m not a scientist. I’m not a psychologist or psychiatrist, I have no formal training in brain science or behavioural analysis. I have not conducted scientific experiments regarding the effects of videogames on the cerebellum or the adrenal gland, or behavioural modification arising from extended gameplay. I’m a forty year old guy who’s played videogames since he was around eight or nine – yes, “Pong” and “Space Invaders” and “Breakout” and onward. If anyone has been saturated in the world of videogames, then it’s me. I drink beer and I live in North America. There are stores near me where I can buy guns.

Oddly, like thousands and thousands of other people, I have not committed mass murder. Is there something special about my brain that allows me to resist the mind-altering effect of these violent videogames? No, I don’t think so. I think the reason that mass-murderers are often found to have stacks of violent videogames is not that they were the CAUSE of the rampage. They were present as an EFFECT of the mindset that allowed the massacre.

yoho

Let me explain. My kids played videogames from an early age. One of them was obsessed with the BBC game of “Yo Ho Ahoy!”, where Claymation pirates perform various tasks around their ship. Repeated exposure to this game did not drive my daughter to become a pirate. Nor did it, I can positively assert, encourage her to mop the floor on a regular basis. The game appeared to do NOTHING to alter her behaviour from what it was. I think this is because she played the game to be involved in a tv programme she enjoyed. She liked the show on tv, and this game allowed her to interact with the characters, watch clips, hear their catchphrases.

I’m a big Star Wars fan. I was five when it came out, and I have grown up with the movies, the books, the extended universe. I have some Star Wars toys still, and a lightsabre. Well…ok, two lightsabres, the one I bought and the one I made myself. To go with my Jedi robes. Ahem.

Anyway, when Lucasfilm produced games that allowed you to play as a young person becoming a Jedi Knight, I leapt at the chance to buy one. I bought the series and have played it through many times. So has my family. None of us have ever tried to emulate the gameplay by decapitating strangers with our home made lightsabres. We play the games because they are a simulation of something we would like to be able to do.

Did I mention we're all Star Wars fans?

Did I mention we’re all Star Wars fans?

Do you see where I’m going with this?

Those murderers weren’t inspired to kill by the games they played. They played the games because it was an opportunity to play out the things that they wanted to do. Playing “Star Wars Starfighter” doesn’t make me want to fly a starship – Wanting to fly a starship makes me PLAY THE GAME. For those would-be murderers, playing the first-person shooter games was a place they could fulfil their need to shoot and kill. For some people, this simulation will be sufficient and they will not go further. For some it will not be enough, just like some people find they only want to smoke cigarettes, while others want to smoke dope and others move on from dope to hard drugs. Why do some people need to escalate and not others? I don’t know. I’m sure there are scientific studies on that somewhere.

We’ll hear this argument again and again, because the real causes of these horrible events are far more complex. They are to do with a lack of empathy, a loss of hope, a lack of role models, of boundaries, of discipline and so many other conflicting things that untangling it could take decades, even if EVERYONE was trying. And they’re really, really not trying. Because fixing it will almost certainly cost a lot of money and it will almost certainly affect someone’s profits. Governments don’t like splashing out money on long-term social issues because the slow results don’t drive votes. And corporations prefer profits to people. It’s easier, in the short term, to advocate banning a small selection of videogames.

Nothing to see here….

I'm thinking....I'm thinking...Aren't I?

I find this more than a little ironic. Last year I put a lot of time and energy into blogging. I tried to blog at least twice a week, and tried to find subjects that were connected to my business interests (writing, plays, theatre) and would also catch the attention of people surfing the web.

I was waving a big sign saying “Come read my stuff! Find out how interesting I am and then buy my plays/books/t-shirts!”*

After six months I had radically improved my readership stats. It was hellishly impressive. On the other hand, I hadn’t written any new plays. Or anything else. Sales of the plays already published were slack. I hadn’t improved my situation at all. I had lots of readers who enjoyed my blog, which was nice, but….not a lot of use in terms of my business model.

Since February began I’ve been running this new system, and it’s working. I have produced a full length play, and a one act play that I’ve been MEANING to write since August last year. I’ve also moved on with other writing projects and gained significant confidence about taking on new challenges.

What I haven’t been doing, is blogging. I realised this the other day when I was updating my “Books I read in March” list, and found that I had only blogged once since posting the list from February.

This is my apology, if you’re a regular reader. I enjoy having a blog, and I like the fact that some people have found it a useful conduit. I love being able to talk directly with people about writing, or discussing points raised in the posts. But I’m not a blogger who writes plays, I’m a playwright who blogs. I know it’s important to have an author platform, and be approachable, and interact synergistically with your readership, but hey, I’m on G+ and Facebook and Twitter too.

I’m not going to feel guilty about intermittent blogging when the alternative is reviewing the recipes I’ve used for lunch, or how I prefer Tim Horton’s to Starbucks. I hope you’ll still read what I post, when I post, but if not, I’ll understand.

 

 

 

*Nobody EVER bought the t-shirts.

For the love of Story

Or Why I think “Wreck it Ralph” is a great movie

Really, what’s not to like?

Saturday night has become Family Movie night. Some might imagine a wonderful affair of  shared enjoyment, laughter and love abounding amidst snack foods and good entertainment.

Well, no. We’re a family of five, and the Weasels are each three years apart, so getting a consensus on a film to watch is nigh-on impossible. Lots of deals get made, trading a vote on this week’s movie for a veto on the next one etc etc. It was by this system that we settled on Wreck it Ralph for this last Saturday. Mrs Dim heaved a dramatic sigh and recited her mantra about computer animation being ubiquitous and having run its course. The younger Weasels squealed that they had been waiting AGES to see this movie, and Eldest shrugged in resignation and said “As long as it isn’t Twilight, then, whatever.”

Me? I like animated movies. There are some clunkers out there, but Pixar raised the bar pretty high and everyone seems to be trying to beat them at their own game. I was interested in seeing Wreck it Ralph because I’d begun a screenplay many years ago called “Twist Stiffly goes to Gamesworld” about a bunch of computer game characters abandoning a pc that had been infected with a virus and escaping to an online gameshub that was always on. I never got beyond the preliminary planning, but was pleased to see someone had taken up a variant of the idea and run with it.*

Not everyone will love this movie. Some people won’t like the characters, or the environment, or the silliness of the story. Some people won’t like the stars chosen to voice the characters, and some people will object because their favourite video game character has not ben given a guest spot. These are all valid reasons for not liking the movie.

But I contend that it’s a beautifully CRAFTED story.

There’s an old saying that if there’s a gun on the mantelpiece in the first act, it has to go off in the third act. Ralph does this with style. Tiny snippets of information come back again and again to be screamingly relevant. For example, when Ralph first expresses his dissatisfaction with his lot in life, other characters say “You’re not going Turbo, are you?” We have to wait a few scenes for this reference to be explained, but it turns out Turbo was a character who jumped into another arcade game, causing such problems that both his game and the new one were scrapped – the ultimate horror for characters. This seemed sufficient for the plot, because we now knew there could be serious consequences for all the characters in Ralph’s game if he didn’t return to the right machine in time. We also knew that one rogue character could wreck another game. But in a startling coup-de-grace, that little story of Turbo comes in very important to the plot in the final act.

In another example, we’re told in the game “Hero’s Duty” that the Psybugs become what they eat. This is used as a gag when a bug eats Ralph’s gun and becomes a gunbug, blazing away with two gun arms while chasing Ralph. Later we’re reminded of this fact when the escaped Psybug eats some candy in “Sugar Rush” and becomes a candybug. Once more, we think the idea is done, when it becomes a terrifying twist in the final act.

Not my joke, but I like it...

Not my joke, but I like it…

This resonance of themes and props throughout a story is something JK Rowling did particularly well in Harry Potter. Remember “The Chamber of Secrets”? Harry goes astray when using Floo powder for the first time and ends up in Bourgin and Burke’s shop. He hides in a cabinet. Four books later, that same cabinet is used by another character to deadly effect. In the fifth book, the main characters are sorting out items that are left in Sirius’ house and amongst them is a locket no one can open. That turns out to be the Horcrux Harry and Dumbledore go looking for in the next book. The fact that the Sword of Gryffindor can be pulled from the Sorting Hat (first shown in book 2) is used again in book 7 when Neville draws out the sword to kill Nagini.

This all underlines the importance of two factors: First, plan your story. Write it out, then look for areas than can be linked, for parts of the story that resonate together.

Second, KNOW your story. The main character is a carpenter? Why? If the answer is a shrug, then LOOK AT THE STORY AGAIN! In “Inkheart”, the main character is a bookbinder, and the story is all about books and words. Would the story have worked if the character were a sheet metal worker who just liked to read stories to his daughter at night? Maybe, but something would have been lost. Think of “Liar Liar”: Jim Carrey’s character has to tell the truth BUT HE’S A LAWYER! If he was just a man who didn’t keep his promises, that would be significant, and perhaps his son would have made the same wish, but would it have complicated things so much? A lawyer is a trade associated (rightly or wrongly) with lies.

When they’re done well, these moments make us gasp. We say “Oh, OF COURSE! THAT’S why that was there! Why didn’t I see it?”

Writers live for those moments.

 

What revelatory moments have stayed with you from books and movies?

 

 

*Note: I’m not going to sue “them” for “stealing my idea”. You can’t copyright ideas, nor should you be able to. Had I written the entire thing and submitted it to the producers of Ralph, and they had turned it down and THEN written Ralph…Well, even then I’d be hard pressed to prove it was MY idea that lead to the movie. There are millions of writers in the world, and many of them will be struck by similar ideas at the same time. Stealing ideas almost never happens. It doesn’t need to. Most writers don’t have time to write down all their own ideas, let alone start writing down other people’s stories….

Writing method trial – the result

There's memes, there's gags, and there's real life. This one is all three.

With luck, this joke will no longer be true of my writing life…

Last month I ran a trial. I was going to take an old project, one that had been through many incarnations, and start over one more time. This time, however, I would be using a new method, gleaned from Rachel Aaron’s book, “2000 – 10000″.

On the wall is the plot overview, beneath it are the two scene breakdowns, then the individual sheets are for each scene.

On the wall is the plot overview, beneath it are the two scene breakdowns, then the individual sheets are for each scene.

The method itself isn’t very revolutionary – at least, not in the way I applied it. I would simply start by outlining the whole plot, then do a more detailed outline, and then break that detailed outline into scenes. Finally I would take each scene and write another detailed outline, and then I would write the script, a scene at a time, from the outlines.

Some of you are probably wondering what the hell I did before now, if this is my “revolutionary” system. Well, like I said in my original post, I wrote by the seat of my pants, hoping that the storyline would work out along the way and end up somewhere satisfactory.

Yes, really.

Being the lazy toerag I am, I took the first three weeks of February writing outlines. I left myself the last week to actually write the play itself. I reckoned it broke down into about eight scenes, four in each half, with a prologue setup. The first day of writing was very encouraging, with two scenes completed in an hour and a half, with a word count of two thousand words or more. This was actually working!

I only got to spend four days that week writing, and didn’t get my two scenes a day, though I was well on the way by the time Friday rolled around. I was confident that I would have this play done and dusted by the end of the first week of March.

Well, this is the Tuesday of that week. I wrote “Curtain” on the final scene of Act Two this morning, in a sort of daze. All in all, I’ve spent around eight to ten hours actually writing. Maybe two work days for real people*. I’ve produced, in that time, over 11000 words, and a complete full-length play, my first in more than a year. I’ve also done the preliminary planning for a one-act play that I intend to have finished by Friday. And I don’t think that’s unreasonable.

I’m not going to say this is the only system, or even the best system. What I’ve found in the past is that any system will have its champions and its detractors. What works for me may be living hell for someone else. But I know I have done more and better work in the last fortnight than I have in the two years preceding. My next aim is to have three short plays adding up to a decent one-act written and ready for publication by the end of this month – one a week. If I can achieve that, and I think I can, I will have proved this new system to my satisfaction.

What’s YOUR system? Doesn’t have to be a writing system – for a while we had the infamous “Tidy Friday” plan, where everyone in the household cleaned the whole place between four and six on a Friday night, so we had a clean home for the weekend. Tell me the secrets you’ve discovered that lead to an organised life! Best suggestion wins a personalised Certificate of Organisationalism!

 

 

*i.e. not writers. Writers aren’t real people.

February Reading – Filling the shortest month.

It’s been a busy short month, and I haven’t been to the library as often as I’d like. As I mentioned last week, I’m working on a new method of writing, and it’s going well – with a day left, I am only three scenes short of finishing, and have accumulated over eight thousand words in five and a half hours of writing.

Mechanicals – Jordan Stratford

This was a recommended read and I picked up the e-version for my kindle. It’s a steampunk adventure, and while I found it engrossing enough, it uses a multi-strand story device that was irritating too. The story of the novel rounds off reasonably well, but with the inescapable fact that there are more in the series to read. It was fun and well done, but I won’t be getting the next one.

The Ghost Brigades – John Scalzi

Every now and then, I go back to a book I have read many times before. It’s comforting, and there is often the joy of discovering something hitherto unnoticed. “Old Man’s War” is one of my favourite audio books, and listening to it inspires me to read this book, the sequel. I would not hesitate to recommend “Old Man’s War” and then “Ghost Brigades” to anyone.

The Inexplicables – Cherie Priest

“Boneshaker” was probably the first steampunk novel I ever read, so I have followed the series with interest. Cherie Priest says this is the last book she intends to set in Seattle, but I hope not. I’d love to see a game adaptation of Seattle-within-the-wall. A friend who works in film costume says there’s a steampunk movie being filmed in Vancouver, and I’m hoping it’s “Boneshaker”…

Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader – James Luceno

I was a chapter into this book before I realised I’d read it before. It’s a good attempt to get into the character of Anakin Skywalker as he changes into Darth Vader, something that naturally occurs AFTER he’s encased in the suit that we all know. It’s interesting to me, because it dwells on the problems he has adapting to his artificial limbs after being such a dazzling swordsman and athletic Jedi.

Shadow Show – Various Authors

This was a book I wanted to love. It’s a collection of short stories by published authors who have been inspired by Ray Bradbury. I’ve read some Bradbury (because, who hasn’t?) and I liked it well enough. But I guess I will always prefer Asimov. Sorry. Thus, this collection was impressive and well put together, but not for me.

Eden Close – Anita Shreve

There are some books you read and think “This person wants to win a literary award”. Either the situation described in the book, or the writing will clue you in that this is not entertainment but LITERATURE. The right hand is typing, the left hand is holding the Thesaurus and the head is firmly inserted up the bum. Don’t get me wrong, this is a well crafted story, and I wanted to read it through to the end, but I felt bad I didn’t have a trophy or cheque to award the author when I finished reading.

Sandman – Dream Hunters – Neil Gaiman

I like to grab the odd graphic novel from the library. They feel like easy reading, when in fact they often cram more ideas and expression into each page than the literary novels like the one mentioned above. In this case, it’s hardly a graphic novel, more like a beautifully illustrated short story. I love Neil Gaiman’s prose, combining pith, poetry and practicality in every line. His stories stay real, even when dealing with the world of dreams.

I’m halfway through another collection of short stories, and have a couple of books stacked up for next month. John Scalzi’s “The Human Division” is playing chapter by chapter on my audio book device and I have another two books downloaded and waiting for playing.

I think I’m looking forward to March.

Meeting your heroes

One of my literary heroes that I HAVE met - Terry Pratchett, at a book signing in Winchester, 2006

One of my literary heroes that I HAVE met – Terry Pratchett, at a book signing in Winchester, 2006

When I first began to really read, I devoured the books of two authors in particular – Douglas Adams and Harry Harrison. I loved their books, read them until the paperbacks fell to pieces and could’ve won trivia contests on obscure plot points.

I didn’t know a thing about the authors themselves. Much later, I got to read articles about, and interviews with, Douglas Adams. I have a copy of “The Salmon of Doubt”, a book put together after his tragically early death, with interviews, articles and unfinished stories. That fills out a little more of the man that I didn’t know.

But this is the 21st Century. This week, I have had the works of John Scalzi almost exclusively playing on my audio books playlist – he’s releasing his new book “The Human Division” chapter by chapter, and I’m buying the audio versions through Audible.com. I stumbled across his blog/website “Whatever” when googling something else, and as a result of becoming a reader of his posts, I bought one of his books. Then several more. This is proof that blogging can lead to book sales. But as well as learning I liked his work, I learned a lot about Mr Scalzi too (though, having not met him, it seems rude to call him “John”). I know the names of his immediate family and have seen pictures of them (that he released in specific circumstances, not because I’ve broken into his house with a flashlight and a stocking mask…) I know about his lawn-mowing habits and ukulele playing desires. I’ve even seen him fall on his ass while singing the theme tune to one of his novels.

The point of all this is that authors have now really got the option of stepping out of the shadow of their books. One of the things I have always loved about Stephen King’s short story collections is his habit of explaining a little something of them either before or afterwards. He talks about the genesis of the idea, or how the story was changed, or where a character came from. Now he has a website, there’s the chance that a direct query might be answered in person, that those things you might otherwise have wondered about til your dying day could be sorted out in an email.

Much as I liked the image of a Salinger-like hermit, locked away from the world, dropping pearls of books to adoring but distant readers, this idea of accessible authors is much more exciting. I’m sure they’re occasionally ticked off with the number of wannabes who press them for the secret of their success, or where they get their ideas from, but they also get the positive feedback, the letters and emails that say how much their work is admired. Today, anyone can write a book and get it published. You can have your own work available for sale through Amazon, the most popular method of book purchasing in the modern world. This being the case, publishing your work isn’t the prize it once was. What’s more important to a lot of writers (and I know this is true of myself) is hearing that other people have been affected by the stories, that they have been touched by the tale in the same way the author was. That they’re glad it was written down and sent out into the world.

Writers write because they have to, because the stories demand to be told. But we publish because we want to share those stories.*

So take advantage of this amazing new world we live in. Reach out and meet the authors you admire. And not in a “Here’s my underwear, please sign it and send me some of yours” kind of way. Read their blogs, add your review of their books to Amazon and Goodreads and other review sites. Link to their blogs from yours so other people can find them too.

I know, from what other people have said, that meeting Douglas Adams could be a joyous thing, and I’m sorry I never had the chance. But I have had reply tweets and emails from Neil Gaiman, from James Moran, and John Scalzi, and Chuck Wendig. People whose words have moved me, have changed the way I see the world. People who, ten years ago, would have been as distant to me as the stars they write about.

Which authors have you contacted and heard back from? Which blogs do you recommend? Which author (living or dead) would you most like to converse with? Bearing in mind the dead ones won’t be much for conversation…..

 

 

* receiving a large sum of money in return is often looked upon as a bonus, however.